Skip to main content

Class I and II opinions of Judge Coleman -- Court Terms 1969-1970; 1970-1971

 File — Folder: 1
Identifier: Folder 1
Includes memoranda on summary calendar opinions and other orders of Judge Coleman, among which, memoranda on: Parris, Charles William v. United States of America No.30,919 Porter, Scurry v. Wingate M. White No. 26,959 Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Rose Ellen Schroeder No. 26,366 Pugh, Warren M. v. Southern Rail Co. No. 26,692 Ryan, Robert v. Louis L. Wainwright No. 28,757 Seales, William Henry v . United States of America No. 28,242 Sellers, D.R., Bankrupt v. Small Business Administration No. 26,420 Texas Committee on Natural Resources, et al. v. United States of America No. 28,962 Tittle, William Alexander v. United States of America No. 71-1217 United States v. Apadaca No. 28,695; 429 F.2d 39 (1970) Includes TLS of Judge Coleman on the record, the district court proceedings, the merits, and his proposed opinion. United States v. Brown Nos. 26,249, 30,405; 456 F.2d 1112 (1972) Includes TLS of Judge Coleman on disposition of the appeal. United States v. Cook No. 26,988; 419 F.2d 1306 (1969) Judge Wisdom objected to the proposed classification of this case, and it was reclassified for argument. Includes TL of Judge Wisdom on classification of this appeal, and on classification of criminal appeals, generally. United States v. Desoto Parish School Board, et al. No. 28,728 United States v. Edwards, Horace Lemar & Ronald Clifton No. 30,601 United States v. Flanagan, John W. No. 30,533 United States v. Fragus No. 27,801; 428 F.2d 1211 (1970) Originally screened by a panel of Judge Wisdom, Coleman and Simpson, Judge Coleman suggested the case be classified as a Class I, and circulated a proposed per curiam affirmance. Judge Wisdom objected and suggested that the case be reclassified and that supplemental briefs be filed. The case was then heard by a panel of Chief Judge Brown, Judges Coleman and Clark. Includes proposed affirmance of Judge Coleman; and, TL of Judge Wisdom on the Coleman opinion and on reclassification as appropriate. Also includes TLS of Judge Simpson and TL of Judge Wisdom on the subsequent opinion of the panel, and on reconsideration of the opinion by the panel as appropriate. United States v. Hollon, Hershel No. 28,020 United States v. Joseph, Edward No. 27,076 United States v. Reed, Ellis D. No. 28,303 United States v. Slate, Marston G., estate of No. 28,814 Wade, Carroll v. Wainwright, Louie L No. 26,387 & 26,388 Wilson v. United States No. 30,424; 437 F.2d 113 (1971) Judge Coleman’s proposed opinion, in which Judge Wisdom had concurred, was not filed. Instead, at the suggestion of Judge Simpson, the case was affirmed under Rule 21 Includes proposed opinion of Judge Coleman.

Dates

  • Created: 1957-1980

Extent

From the Collection: 0.00 Linear Feet

Creator

Repository Details

Part of the Tulane Law School Repository

Contact:
6239 Freret St
New Orleans LA 70118 US