United States v. Cox

No. 22,013

En Banc. Concurring opinion of Judge Wisdom.

Judge Rives first submitted a proposed dissenting opinion, to be followed in suit by Judge Bell, who concurred as well in the Rives opinion. Then Judge Jones circulated a proposed majority opinion, which caused Judge Rives to redraft his dissent, incorporating the views of Judges Bell and Gewin. Judge Bell withdrew his own opinion, and concurred in the Rives redraft.

Hauberg v. Cox No. 22,019; 342 F.2d 167, cert. den. 381 U.S. 935 (1965)

Includes TLS of Chief Judge Tuttle on constitution of an en banc court as appropriate; and, TLS of Judge Rives on the possible appointment of a special prosecutor.

Also includes opinion first proposed by Judge Rives; TL of Judge Rives on his dissent as first proposed; propsed dissent of Judge Bell; and, TL of Judge Bell on the Rives proposal and his own proposed dissent.

Also includes TLS of Judge Jones on his opinion; TLS (2) of Judge Rives on revision of his opinion and on the revised opinion; TLS of Judge Bell on the merits and on reconsideration of the merits by the judges in the majority as appropriate; TLS of Judge Jones on possible Supreme Court review; and, TLS of Judge Rives on the opinions filed and the result reached in the case.

See also 87: 4.